Today's Sun:
Tyrannosaurus Pecks: King of dinosaurs became the chicken
Complete with horrendous "March of Progress"-esque PhotoShop transformation between Tyrannosaurus rex and a domestic chicken, although even before you get into the whole Tyrannosaurus-didn't-actually-morph-into-a-chicken thing it looks bad - "evolution" is supposed to be left-to-right but the animals are facing the wrong way.
Don't read the comments though. Unless you've been told by your doctor that your blood pressure is dangerously low and that your only hope is exposing yourself to the lobotomised.
The Science website has the abstract up now, so I'll include the citation. Full text access only to subscribers though (of which I am not one, grrr). I know the battles have raged about whether journal articles should be freely available or not. But surely it could only be a good thing if the journals made available the PDF of whatever paper they're really pushing? Even just on the day of the press release, so that the journalists and bloggers could get a look at the primary source? Some journals seem to do that and then restrict access a week after the article has come out. It couldn't do any harm, and it might actually improve scientific literacy.
Organ, C.L., M.H. Schweitzer, W. Zheng, L.M. Freimark, L.C. Cantley & J.M. Asara. 2008. Molecular Phylogenetics of Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex. Science 320 p499. doi: 10.1126/science.1154284.
Tyrannosaurus Pecks: King of dinosaurs became the chicken
Complete with horrendous "March of Progress"-esque PhotoShop transformation between Tyrannosaurus rex and a domestic chicken, although even before you get into the whole Tyrannosaurus-didn't-actually-morph-into-a-chicken thing it looks bad - "evolution" is supposed to be left-to-right but the animals are facing the wrong way.
Don't read the comments though. Unless you've been told by your doctor that your blood pressure is dangerously low and that your only hope is exposing yourself to the lobotomised.
The Science website has the abstract up now, so I'll include the citation. Full text access only to subscribers though (of which I am not one, grrr). I know the battles have raged about whether journal articles should be freely available or not. But surely it could only be a good thing if the journals made available the PDF of whatever paper they're really pushing? Even just on the day of the press release, so that the journalists and bloggers could get a look at the primary source? Some journals seem to do that and then restrict access a week after the article has come out. It couldn't do any harm, and it might actually improve scientific literacy.
Organ, C.L., M.H. Schweitzer, W. Zheng, L.M. Freimark, L.C. Cantley & J.M. Asara. 2008. Molecular Phylogenetics of Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex. Science 320 p499. doi: 10.1126/science.1154284.















